Turn the words around a bit, and you will transform each into a goal for a child to work toward. You can also use our statements to indicate a need for improvement. You've reached the end of another grading period, and what could be more daunting than the task of composing insightful, original, and unique comments about every child in your class? The following positive statements will help you tailor your comments to specific children and highlight their strengths. Struggling Students? Check out our Needs Improvement Report Card Comments for even more comments! Here are 125 positive report card comments for you to use and adapt! It's report card time and you face the prospect of writing constructive, insightful, and original comments on a couple dozen report cards or more. Are we doing the best we can to meet their needs? With all that said, maybe we need to have more conversations about what’s happening with these 120 I.Q. Studies by the Renzulli folks at the University of Connecticut have shown that there is little or no difference between the quality of work on school projects, for example, between these 120-something kids and those in the top 5 percent of the intelligence scale. of 120, there is little connection between I.Q. Researchers that found that beyond an I.Q. In many instances, these children are just as capable, if not more, than those we label highly gifted. These students, I believe, suffer the most since they are often the teacher-pleasers, the ones who get ignored since they do their work and produce good grades and test scores (of course, I’m generalizing here). children, like the one I mentioned at the start of the blog, who excel through curriculum at a faster rate and crave enrichment opportunities in the classroom but slightly miss qualifying for gifted programs. I think there almost needs to be an advanced student-type program or services that’s created for those mid-to-high 120 I.Q. You want to ensure that the students be selected for gifted services have a genuine need for those services. Where do you draw that line? You have to establish some sort of baseline, some standard. This ensures that certain types of students are not excluded from gifted and talented programs. tests, to teacher recommendations, to classroom performance. A Plan B type option might work for these children, but not it’s entirely based on family economics or race.Įxperts will tell you that the best approach is to generally cast a wide net by using a number of assessments, ranging from I.Q. States holding to a hard-and-fast cutoff score establish a high standard but run the risk of missing out on these high potential children, who may not perform well on a particular test or score slightly below the mark. Students in New York are tested using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test and the Otis-Lennon School Ability Test and must score 90 percentile or above to enter district programs and 97 percentile or above to qualify for city programs. In Georgia, students must meet cut-off scores on mental ability tests and national norm reference tests, but in the case of Plan B, looks at creativity and motivation levels as well. scores along with teacher-completed characteristic checklists to qualify students. This brings up the question: what is the best way to identify and effectively qualify students for gifted programs? And what do we do with high-potential, high-performing students, who just miss the cut-off? I truly believe that these high-potential children, such as the one mentioned above, would definitely benefit from a gifted program or something like it. But what happens if the child does not meet the “Plan B” criteria but, nevertheless, has an above-average I.Q.? lower scores if they are eligible for free or reduced lunch programs or receive English as a second language services. Now, in some cases, student can qualify for gifted programs with I.Q. The district requires a 130 or higher intelligence quotient, or two standard deviations from the norm. The reason this child does not qualify comes down to numbers. The ringer: she doesn’t qualify for gifted services. And yes, her test scores are well above average. During English/language arts, she masters research, reads grade levels above her peers, and exhibits creativity, innovation, and initiative. I work with one elementary student, who performs high or higher than most of my gifted students.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |